We went to court on this issue and lost. WIFI was deployed, and BYOD (Bring Your Own Device – meaning using cellphones in class) was adopted.

Now everybody can see the damage, and the ministry is banning the use in middle schools.

Not just in Israel, also in Norway – https://youtu.be/DbMTfxM7npY

Articles about the ban

https://www.jpost.com/israel-news/article-896474

https://www.ynetnews.com/article/hyifuuv1me

The post Israel ministry of Education to ban cellphones in middle schools 05-2026 appeared first on www.norad4u.com.

One month to the war Israel+USA vs IRAN

Video – https://youtu.be/kkZmIUvdqog

The post WAR UPDATE 29-3-2026 – operating almost as usual. appeared first on www.norad4u.com.

“RF PROTECTION HATS FOR EHS PEOPLE. FOR THE CAR, IN THE OFFICE, ON THE STREET, AND EVEN AT HOME”

The products are available at our store site – https://www.4ehsbyehs.com/rf-protection-hat/

The post New visual explanation about our RF Protection Hats for EHS people appeared first on www.norad4u.com.

The post Video Update 08-MAR-2026 www.norad4u.com appeared first on www.norad4u.com.

“There is no way you can detect radiation from cell phones. If you can demonstrate that you can identify whether a phone is active or not inside a closed box, it would be an incredible medical breakthrough! Has any of you ever performed such an experiment?”

My reply and explanation

First of all, I do not usually approve the entry of “EMF/EHS harm-deniers” into this group. As an exception, I have approved your membership and your comment, for the slim chance that you are truly naive and unfamiliar with the subject, haven’t experienced it yourself, and are genuinely here to learn. However, if there is any hint of denying the damages or denying Electromagnetic Hypersensitivity (EHS) in your comments, I will block you.

I suspect you are basing your opinion on flawed experiments regarding EHS published in industry-funded studies. These studies committed numerous errors in exposure testing, including exposing subjects when there was supposedly no exposure, and expecting sensitive individuals to react to every type of non-ionizing radiation—instantly, always, and to be “as good as new” after a few minutes without exposure (or with less exposure). You can read about these studies and their flaws on my website:
https://www.norad4u.com/ehs/studies-disproving-ehs/

Naturally, these studies were embraced by deniers and promoted by the industry as if they were the truth. To this day, this is what is taught in academia (without understanding the subject and without a critical look at the studies themselves). In contrast, there are many studies showing that EHS individuals react in one way or another to exposure, as well as studies showing biomarkers and neurological findings in EHS sufferers. These studies are also summarized on my site:
https://www.norad4u.com/ehs/studies-supporting-ehs/

It is possible that you simply do not want to believe that EHS is possible or caused by radiation, and it is easy and convenient for you to think we are all mentally ill. After all, you are a high-tech worker, a computer science graduate, likely a heavy cell phone user, and surrounded by radiation throughout your day. To think that you are harming yourself is a problematic thought for you. Thinking that you don’t understand or know everything might also be an inconceivable thought.

You seem to feel contempt toward those who are sensitive, and contempt toward the possibility that EHS is real, caused by radiation exposure, and that non-ionizing radiation (specifically RF radiation) has biological and health effects at exposure levels lower than those that cause heating. If that is the case, you probably won’t be able to “digest” studies showing mechanisms of harm, effects, damages, and morbidity resulting from exposure (https://www.norad4u.com/emf-science-studies/studies-lists/). This contradicts what is common in “denier” and industry circles.

Regarding whether EHS individuals can identify transmitting phones inside a box: the answer is not always, and not every person. The individual must be sensitive to the specific type of radiation being transmitted (not everyone is sensitive to all types of frequencies and transmissions. Asmart phone my be emitting UMTS, LTE, WIFI, Bluetooth, NFC, other…), and the intensity must be such that it causes a noticeable and distinct change, without harming them or worsening their condition.

I, for example, feel cell phones. In the past, when I was more sensitive and worked in high-tech, I would literally “detect” active cell phones through the drywall of my lab, and discover transmissions inside the lab or at home. Usually, I was later able to confirm this with a radiation meter and find the source. Today, I am less sensitive and can spend a little time in an environment with cell phones, so my detection ability is lower. But still, after a day of cumulative exposure that is too high for me, I will feel unwell.

For instance, this week I am conducting tests in my home lab with RF transmitters in the open air. I sit two meters away from the transmitters (a transmission weaker than the average cell phone). I don’t feel the radiation immediately, but by the end of the day, I am more tired than usual. Last week, there was one day where I overdid it with the exposure (working with an amplifier), and than I felt the radiation during the day. There was even a point in the day, as the pain accumulated, where I could actually feel every start and end of a transmission, and even an electric field from a USB cable I added near the computer. Then, and exactly then, that additional radiation was enough to trigger my “detection.” The next day, after a good night’s sleep, I no longer felt the cables.

Personally, I have had hundreds of cases where I identified radiation based on feeling and later identified the source with a meter. This includes cases where radiation shielding stopped working (e.g., a grounding wire disconnected) and I identified it by feeling worse. I assume many EHS sufferers here have similar experiences—not every time, not with every type of radiation, but with the right exposure, at the right intensities and the right type, they recognize it.

This is not something you can base a precise research protocol on that will work for everyone, everytime. But it is enough to understand that you are sensitive. Even those with mild (Low) sensitivity, who are only at the beginning of their decline, will notice that every time they talk for more than “X” amount of time on a cell phone held to their head, they get a headache afterward. This might sound delusional to addicts or industry people, but it is very common.

Beyond that, I guide many sensitive individuals, and during the process, we gradually reduce their exposure to radiation. In most cases, the improvement is significant. Furthermore, in the past, there were those who intentionally exposed me to radiation to see if I would react (without my consent or knowledge); I usually caught them fairly quickly (though not instantly). Today, as mentioned, I am less sensitive (an improvement resulting from years of reducing exposure and improving my health), and I probably wouldn’t identify it as quickly.

The post Replay on Facbook – EHS people will not be able to identify if a phone is ON or OFF appeared first on www.norad4u.com.

Of course, I recommend learning how to operate your device in a way that allows you to stop its wireless transmissions at any time. However, I have come to understand that there are people who find this difficult for various reasons, even if they are aware of the potential harm of radiation and want to reduce their exposure.

Exactly for them, I developed this new product: a small pouch made of radio-frequency (RF) shielding fabric. The moment a mobile phone is placed inside it, and the opening is closed, the pouch blocks all signal reception and radiation from the phone. After a few minutes, the phone “gives up” trying to connect and stops transmitting.

The principle behind this is the Faraday Cage effect—a conductive layer that prevents external radiation from entering and affecting what is inside the pouch, and likewise prevents radiation from inside from escaping outward.

Why use such a pouch/bag?

There are several main reasons for using a radio-frequency shielding pouch:

1. Stopping phone transmission and reception

When the mobile phone is inside the pouch, it cannot receive calls, messages, internet data, GPS signals, and more. This can be useful during sleep, important meetings, or any situation in which you do not want to receive or transmit wireless signals.

2. Reducing exposure to electromagnetic radiation

According to the conductive-fabric principle, radiation emitted by the phone cannot escape outward, thereby reducing exposure for people nearby.

3. Privacy and security

In certain use cases, Faraday bags are also used to prevent tracking or eavesdropping, block location signals, prevent remote access to the device, or protect against signal detection or interception devices.

Video

Link:https://youtu.be/Tj3IwA-kwTE

Radio-frequency shielding fabric pouch/bag for stopping transmission and reception from a mobile phone

What is important to know before purchasing?

Choosing a high-quality material is very important: quality pouches use conductive fabric with metal layers such as copper, nickel, or a combination of metals that provide broad-frequency shielding.
Complete signal blocking also depends on a perfect seal of the pouch—any small opening or gap can allow radiation to penetrate.

For the product page, see:
Signal and radiation blocking pouch for mobile phones – for people sensitive to radiation
https://www.4ehsbyehs.com/product/cellphone-blocking-small-bag/

We also offer a larger version suitable for more than 10 phones:
https://www.4ehsbyehs.com/product/cellphone-blocking-bag/

The post New Product – CELLPHONE BLOCKING SMALL BAG (Faraday Cage) appeared first on www.norad4u.com.

Studies conducted in the past by the U.S. Department of Health determined that radiation from mobile phones alters the brain’s pattern of sugar consumption (Nora Volkow, 2012), and that rats exposed to radiation from mobile phones were at higher risk for cancers, pre-cancerous markers, oxidative stress, damage, and other effects (NTP, 2018). A follow-up study to the NTP, intended to identify the mechanisms of harm, was canceled (my guess: due to industry pressure).

Now, the Department of Health, under the leadership of Health Secretary Kennedy Jonnier, is launching a new study on the subject.

The study is expected to identify and address gaps in existing knowledge and is part of U.S. President Donald Trump’s “Make America Healthy Again” (MAHA) program.

At the same time, pages explaining that mobile phone radiation is not dangerous and does not interfere are gradually being removed from the websites of Department of Health agencies (such as the FDA).

The dawn of a new day?

This is happening in parallel with statements by health authorities, including the FDA, that it has still not been proven that mobile phone radiation causes cancer.

The post US health ministry to launch a study over possible health effect of cellphone radition appeared first on www.norad4u.com.

May it be a year of learning more about EMF, measuring EMF, reducing exposure to EMF, using EMF protection, feeling better, and becoming less sensitive to EMF.

The post Happy New Year 2026 appeared first on www.norad4u.com.

Dave Stetzer was an American engineer, researcher, and inventor, and one of the pioneers in the field of non-ionizing radiation engineering. More precisely, he was a pioneer in the field of reducing exposure to harmful radiation, especially in the area of power quality (electrical pollution – Dirty Electricity), stray ground currents, and proper grounding.

A True Professional and a Kind person

I met Dave 15 years ago at a conference on electrical pollution (Dirty Electricity) organized by the company “Dolev Clean Environment” in Tel Aviv (thank you, Yoni Grainer and Yossi Hershkovich, for inviting me). He was both a professional and a genuinely kind person.

At the conference, the topic of electrical pollution was introduced and explained in Israel for the first time, and Dave was the engineer behind the knowledge, the measurements, and the solution. In fact, the measurement units (GS-Units), the pollution meter (GS-Meter), and the filters (GS-Filter) were all named after him. The “S” stands for his last name, Stetzer (the “G” stands for Graham, the last name of his late partner and co-founder of the company, Prof. Martin Graham, may he rest in peace).

It was as clear as light

For me, the lectures and workshops were eye-opening. The entire day was enlightening. The explanations about the effects of Dirty Electricity helped me connect the dots regarding symptoms and phenomena (that I had seen in myself and others), which, until then, I couldn’t explain. These effects and symptoms often occurred in situations we believed had zero radiation exposure. The professional demonstration using an oscilloscope and a second, simpler dedicated measuring device was both simple and brilliant at the same time, and the solution offered was direct and straightforward.

A true professional and a very kind person

Above all, I was impressed by the man, by Dave. Dave was an engineer, always smiling, modest, pleasant, and calm. He explained patiently to anyone who was willing to listen and shared his knowledge with anyone who wanted to learn—even with skeptics. He was an engineer who not only mastered the technical aspects (and it was clear he does) but also understood the effects and harms of non-ionizing radiation (which is rare, as most engineers don’t acknowledge the harm).

At the end of the day, Dave gave me filters and equipment for measurements (including a filter for oscilloscope measurements, which I used several times but lost during one of the times I moved), and he told me not to hesitate to contact him anytime. Whenever I reached out, I received warm responses and tons of information. I understand Dave treated everyone this way—always trying to help, support, teach, and explain.

I tried not to disturb him too much, but from time to time we emailed. He always explained, and always had time.

Work and Legacy

Dave Stetzer, together with Professor Martin Graham, developed and marketed filters and meters for dirty electricity. The meters allowed even those without experience using oscilloscopes to measure the level of electrical pollution in a circuit. I rent out the meter, and when I had a stock of the filters in the past, I also sold them (I still use them to this day).

Dave Stetzer held numerous patents on the subject and published several studies with his partner, Prof. Graham.
You can find some of their research here:
https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Dave-Stetzer

Biographical information (bios) for Dave Stetzer and Professor Graham (who also passed away recently) can be found on their company’s website:
https://www.stetzerelectric.com/about/

Dave leaves behind a remarkable legacy and very large shoes to fill.
May his memory be a blessing.

More memorial posts about Dave Stetzer

https://patriciaburke.substack.com/p/in-memoriam-david-stetzer

https://keithcutter.substack.com/p/remembering-dave-stetzer

Videos and Interviews

Ground Currents and Power Quality Problems – https://youtu.be/Pcz76c0Msbg

49-minute interview about Dirty electricity and it’s effect – https://youtu.be/MKEy8oVMKKY

R.I.P. DAVE STETZER

The post Remebering Dave Stezer 1952- 2025 appeared first on www.norad4u.com.

Shana Tova (Good year) to all the readers of the site and their families.
A year of improved health, growth, development, learning, measuring, reducing exposure, and switching to wired alternatives.
A year of successful coping with electromagnetic sensitivity, a year of awareness, wise decisions, and mutual support.
A year of positive change, fulfillment, and realization…
A year of victory on all fronts, and the return of the hostages.
Wishing you all a good and sweet year.

Amir – No Radiation For You.

The post HAPPY NEW JEWISH YEAR!!! appeared first on www.norad4u.com.