Does your head ache all day long?
Do you feel pain in side your head after using your cellphone, mobile-phone, smart-phone or cordless phone?
Do you have one or few of these symptoms?
Do you feel tired after using your wireless PC (desktop or laptop)?
Then you might be an Electromagnetic HyperSensitive (EHS for short) person!
Please read on!!!
Evidence for a Novel Neurological Syndrome - Marino AA. 2011
Electromagnetic Hypersensitivity: Evidence for a Novel Neurological Syndrome - McCarty DE, Carrubba S, Chesson AL, Frilot C, Gonzalez-Toledo E, Marino AA. 2011 - https://maisonsaine.ca/wp-content/uploads/2015/05/172-IntJNeurosci2011.pdf
In this study an EHS person was exposed to ELF(Extreme Low Frequency) EMR and showed severe symptoms The objective tests were done using EEG, MRI, Heartbeat measurement, blood test and other physical methods of sensing and did not rely on the subject observation or any subjective evaluation.
Abstract - https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21793784
A leading team of scientists led by Professor Belpomme is investigating the EHS (since 2009) and should soon publish it'sfinal papers. The group have published in 2015 partial findings that show bio markers for EHS and MCS(Multi Chemical Sensitivity).
Link - http://www.degruyter.com/view/j/reveh.2015.30.issue-4/reveh-2015-0027/reveh-2015-0027.xml?format=INT
More about this work: http://mieuxprevenir.blogspot.co.il/2012/06/electrosensitivity-es-ehs.html
Video presentation of Prof Belpomme - http://youtu.be/ONVFHQTuvD8
"Metabolic and Genetic Screening of Electromagnetic Hypersensitive Subjects as a Feasible Tool for Diagnostics and Intervention"
This Finish study has analyzes the ways to handle and treat EHS condition and there effect. The study showed that reducing exposure was the most effective way to handle EHS and to reduce symptoms in most people. Other effective steps were nutritious changes, using food supplements and physical activity. Psychological and psychiatric treatment (this is how main stream medicine try to treat EHS) was not effective and even worsen some of the EHS people condition
In this Japanese study they went and asked EHS people how there condition effect their life, how they cope with there condition and what they believe were the reason the condition was caused by.
More studies about EHS at: http://www.es-uk.info/info/research.asp
More studies about EMF health effect at - http://www.norad4u.com/knowledge/studies
There are other studies about EHS that have showed that people how claim to be EHS can't tell when an EMR source is on or off. Most of these studies suffer from logical problems originated from the misunderstanding of EHS. In some case the EHS persons were exposed to several different types of EMR in the experiment, without taking into consideration that some EHS person are sensitive to only some part of the electromagnetic spectrum, and can't detect all the type of Electromagnetic radiation. In some studies EHS persons were exposed several times, one after the other, without giving them time to recover between each exposure.
A good example of these bad studies is the ESSEX study which has the following flows:
More about the Essex study at: http://www.mast-victims.org/resources/docs/essex-study-phillip-watts.pdf
Official Outcomes of the study showed the EHS people guessed that the source was on (UTMS and GSM combined - and this is a mistake because not all EHS people react the same to UMTS and GSM) in 66% in the short exposures cycles and 69% in the long exposure cycles (better than the control group guessing percentage).
The Essex study results:
A review of the study by powerwathc.org.uk site: http://www.powerwatch.org.uk/news/20080201_ehp_journal_response.asp
Criticism of the study by Stelios A. Zinelis:
A testimony of one of the subjects in the study:
Dr. James Rubin is a psychologist who had done a series of studies on Electromagnetic HyperSensitivity (EHS). In his studies he concludes that EHS is a psychological condition. These studies were published as a proof that EHS is not real. Dr. James Rubin was promoted and continues to study EHS. Dr. James Rubin and his Prof. Simon Wessely fail to understand EHS and EMR. Their basic understanding is that each and every EHS person can identify the exact type of EMR that he his being exposed to, right a way. Their studies have the following errors:
Please see my review of his studies- http://norad4u.blogspot.co.il/2013/02/why-dr-james-robin-ehs-study-is.html
These 2 issues along should be enough to discredit the study. More issues on this study are presented in page 4-5 of this report - http://www.powerwatch.org.uk/library/downloads/es-8-appendices-2014-10.pdf (might need to log in) and in this article http://andrewamarino.com/blog/?p=289
picture - the device used to radiate the subjects emit EMR even in idle-sham mode
The following report by Stephen J. Genuis a, Christopher T. Lipp -2011 summaries the background and scientific knowledge about EHS. The report is very good and can be used as preview to EHS, and as a give away to medical stuff that is willing to consider the possibility that EHS is real.
The following article "Letter to the Editor: Will We All Become Electrosensitive?" by ÖRJAN HALLBERG AND GERD OBERFELD, that was published in 2006, bring some of the supporting scientific reports about EHS and summaries several other articles from different countries that estimated the number of EHS people in these countries. This article puts all the results of these estimations on a single graph and shows a constant growth in the percentage of EHS over the years and that in 2017,the percentage of EHS in the public will be ~50%.
picture - from the article, 50% EHS in 2017
In order to start cooping with EHS, we recommend following the "4 Steps Program".